BLOG

The proposed changes, announced by President Trump on January 9, would cut scientists’ voices out of this environmental review process.

The guides will help researchers understand their employer’s policy and navigate the process of filing a scientific integrity complaint.

Find out about our work at the February Ocean Science Meeting, learn about the 388 government attacks on science we've documented, and more.

Dr. George Luber alleges that CDC officials prohibited him from communicating with the press about his work, and prohibited him from participating in a conference on climate change and health.

We published the second edition of “Research Protections in Open Records Laws: An Analysis and Ranking,” join us and the ACLU for a workshop at the AGU Fall Meeting, and more.

One of the most pernicious, ongoing anti-science actions is the abuse of state open records laws to target state university researchers and other publicly-funded scientists.

We took a look at science under the first 1,000 days of Trump, we're countering the White House's attack on science advice, and more.

Under Trump, the federal government has attacked science 249 times—or roughly once every four days since the November 2016 elections.

Federal scientific advisory boards have a critical role in ensuring evidence-based policies, and the effort to disband these boards is harmful to the scientific endeavor.

Events at NOAA highlight strengths and shortcomings of scientific integrity policies, how to contact us for free legal advice, and more.

President Trump’s recent tweets about Hurricane Dorian have resulted in another type of storm that highlights the need for stronger protections for scientific integrity—especially at federal agencies.

Double your impact on the scientific endeavor: Our matching gift challenge ends August 31!