The case stems from overly intrusive open record requests E&E Legal made to the University, asking for over a decade’s worth of emails between climate scientists Jonathan Overpeck and Malcolm Hughes.
BLOG
Read about our work in the media and see our blog posts.
-
News | Court Decisions
University of Arizona Board of Regents to Appeal Trial Court’s Decision in Open Records CaseLearn More
-
News | Court Decisions
Arizona Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Climate ScienceLearn More
The case, which has already been through the trial court twice, now returns to the trial court for a third round.
-
News | Court Decisions
D.C. District Court Rules in Favor of NOAA Climate Scientists in FOIA CaseLearn More
In the case, Judicial Watch sought to use the Freedom of Information Act to obtain NOAA scientists’ emails, drafts, and peer review comments related to a June 2015 paper published in Science.
-
News | Court Decisions
The Importance of Good Email PracticeLearn More
On March 2, the California Supreme Court ruled that the emails and texts of public employees dealing with official business…
-
News | Court Decisions
Virginia Supreme Court Rejects Subpoenas of Climate Scientists’ EmailsLearn More
Statement by Michael Halpern, Union Of Concerned Scientists Today, the Virginia Supreme Court rejected Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s Civil…